National emblem
  • हिन्दी
Screen Reader Access

High Court Of Chhattisgarh

RSS IMPORTANT NOTICE
  • Tender Notice No. 14492 & 14492/CPC/2022, Bilaspur, dated 29th November, 2022.
  • Select List for District Judge (Entry Level) 2020 under Rule 5(1)(c).
  • Tender Notice No. 13554/2022, Bilaspur, dated 10th November, 2022.(for catering services)
  • New Information and Ineligible Lists for recruitment to the post of Contingency paid employee.
  • Endt. No. 13732 Bilaspur, dated 14th November, 2022.
  • Information for recruitment to the post of Contingency paid employee.
  • Regarding constitution of benches for National Lok Adalat on 12th November, 2022.
  • Regarding to depute one or more Magistrates/concerned Presiding Officer of the court to hold special sitting on the day of National Lok Adalat on 12th November, 2022.
  • Following shall be the Roster for the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur with effect from 7th November, 2022.
  • Notification no. 139 Bilaspur, Dated 21 October 2022.(Regarding Holidays of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, for the Year 2023)
  • Notice Regarding Fresh panel for appointment as Amicus curiae in Supreme Court of India.
  • Endt. No. 12585 Bilaspur, dated 17th October, 2022.
  • Regarding Retainer Advocates for the front office of Chhattisgarh High Court Legal Services Committee Bilaspur, dated 20th October, 2022.
  • Notification. No. 12571 & 12573/Rules/2022 Bilaspur, dated 19th October, 2022.
LATEST A F R  RSS LOGO
  • (i)Provisions of Section 144B (6) viii) creates a mandatory obligation upon the department to follow the procedure prescribed.
  • (ii)The word "Shall" in Section 144B(6)(viii) of the Income Tax Act should be read as must so far as giving an assessee a personal hearing.
  • (iii)Refusal of a personal hearing inspite of a request made under Section 144B (6) (viii) amounts to violation of the principles of Natural Justice.
  • If the explanation offered for condonation of delay is concocted or stands falsified by conduct, the courts should not liberally condone the delay.
  • Once a valuable right has accrued in favour of one party as a result of the failure of the other party to explain the delay by showing sufficient cause and its own conduct, it will be unreasonable to take away that right on the mere asking of the applicant, particularly when the delay is directly a result of negligence, default or inaction of that party.
  • It is the onus on the party which alleges fraud in execution of a will to prove the element of fraud.
  • Person who is a gainful employee cannot be said to be dependent on the earning of his father for getting compassionate appointment with the SECL.
  • Master of Human Resource Management (MHRM) is not equivalent to Master of Business Administration (MBA) and determination of equivalence does not lie within domain of writ Court, it is a matter for recruiting authority to determine.
  • The claim of a "married daughter" would fall in the second part of the clause 9.3.3 of National Coal Wage Agreement, like the "widowed daughter" and, therefore, before providing an appointment to her as a dependent employment, an enquiry is needed for in order to ascertain whether she is wholly dependent on the earnings of the deceased employee or not as per the condition required under the said clause.
  • A bare bald averment in WS or in the memo of appeal by itself would not be sufficient to infer that the landlord has an alternative accommodation. it has also to be proved and established by the tenant specifically.
  • Merely because the FIR was lodged belatedly by itself is not crucial to disbelieve the version of the claimants under Motor Vehicle Act. Registration of the FIR even though belatedly is sufficient to accept the occurrence of the accident.
  • The FIR and chargesheet, coupled with the other evidence on record, inarguably establishes the occurrence of the fatal accident and also point towards the negligence of the respondent No. 2 in causing the said accident.
  • While deciding cases arising out of motor vehicle accidents, the standard of proof to be borne in mind must be of preponderance of probability and not the strict standard of proof beyond all reasonable doubt which is followed in criminal cases.